Teenager survived lion bite on the skull. More info in the first comment

    by Lexx_sad_but_true

    35 Comments

    1. Lexx_sad_but_true on

      A 6,200-year-old Bulgarian teenager survived a brutal lion attack that left deep puncture wounds in his skull but died months later from his injuries! 🦁💀

      Archaeozoologist Nadezhda Karastoyanova from Bulgaria’s National Museum of Natural History analyzed the 16-18-year-old’s remains from Kozareva Mogila settlement in eastern Bulgaria, finding a specific pattern of puncture and compressive injuries incompatible with weapons or postmortem damage. By comparing tooth imprints from museum lion and bear skulls using special molding processes, researchers confirmed a Panthera leo lion knocked the teenager down before biting his head multiple times during the Copper Age (4500-3500 BC), when lions roamed Eastern Europe.

      Clear healing signs suggest the community provided medical care for two to three months after the attack, extraordinary given prehistoric lion attack evidence is extremely rare. One wound likely damaged his meninges, the brain-lining membranes, leaving his brain integrity questionable, while deep leg and left arm wounds possibly damaged muscles and tendons. Previous discoveries show Kozareva Mogila inhabitants treated diseases and performed skull surgeries, indicating medical knowledge that may have helped him survive initially.

      The teenager was buried in a crouched position with hands before his face, standing 5 feet 9 inches tall, with no grave goods and unusually deep burial suggesting low social status and community fear. He likely retained severe scars changing his appearance, needed support for everyday movements preventing physical labor like farming, and suffered severely impaired neurological functions.

      🏺⚕️

    2. You mean he suffered for 3 months after being attacked by a lion before succumbing to his wounds.

    3. HumongousFungihihi on

      Today, on things that could have happened 6,000 years ago. the probability is actually quite high that someone survived such an event for some time, especially since lion attacks were far more frequent than today and, statistically, even if only one out of a hundred victims survived, survival would still be expected to occur.

    4. MaterialWitness1009 on

      Than by definition they in fact did NOT survive a lion attack… This is just simple math here kids. It should have said they didn’t die immediately…. Which is much less impressive right.

    5. Honestly, back then im sure they werent even mad. Imagine surviving a lion bite to the head these days with medical technology as it is today, let alone back then. They were probably revered as a miracle and some kind of sign of divine intervention of whatever gods they worshipped. Living an extra day after that would be a blessing im sure

      But also, how the fuck do we even know this? You’re telling me carbon dating or whatever technology is used nowadays can take a skull from over 6000 years ago and differentiate between the damage being caused, then somehow tell us that they died 3 months later? Very skeptical. Sounds a bit farfetched honestly. Smells of hardcore clickbait that clearly worked on me

    6. AGrandNewAdventure on

      What’s more interesting is the level of care provided 6,200 years ago to keep someone alive that long with that amount of trauma.

    7. MixAndMatch333 on

      Wasn’t really recovering if they died, no? Recovering leads to recovery, this one lead to death yo

    Leave A Reply